Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
Howver the principle stands firm: embarrassing UK docs leaked by Wikileaks certainly would be prone to attack on copyright grounds, including DEA s 18, and it is quite possible some of the current Wikileaks documents could quote extensively from material copyright to individuals (and Wikileaks prior to the current batch of cables almost certainly contain copyright material).Interestingly Amazon did in fact, subsequent to this piece, claim they removed Wikileaks from their service, not… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
“Most importantly, what these cables starkly reveal is that diplomacy equals hypocrisy. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
WikiLeaks US embassy cables: live updates. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:29 pm
Acting on his behalf, the campaigning group Reprieve sought judicial review of the decision by Business Secretary, Vince Cable, not to ban the export of sodium thiopental to the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
(see Horsepower) Bridge Formula A bridge protection formula used by federal and state governments to regulate the amount of weight that can be put on each of a vehicle's axles, and how far apart the axles (or groups of axles) must be to legally carry a given weight [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:28 am
He summarizes the legal issue as follows: The recent court opinion in Comcast v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
he pointed to the Satellite Broadcasting and Cable Re-transmission for broadcasts orginating within the EU. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
In Inmacs Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
The dissent also stated that the district court had gone beyond a reasonable reading of the injunction order by forcing EchoStar to physically remove its cable boxes from distributors and customers, whether or not they infringed. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:31 am
The dissent also stated that the district court had gone beyond a reasonable reading of the injunction order by forcing EchoStar to physically remove its cable boxes from distributors and customers, whether or not they infringed. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
Wayne Cable v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Even my cable company can tell me whether to expect the guy in the morning or afternoon. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:20 am
MSNBC Cable, LLC, decided on October 7. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
And I’m not very interested in a discussion of Fox v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
The second was whether "a pluarility of cables" intended two or more or three or more cables. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:20 am
& Williams Brothers Co. v. [read post]
