Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 11:49 am
However, based on the conclusion (or assumption) that Section 399(3) does not speak of consent in writing, the Court stated that the reasoning of the decision in Makhan Lal Jain v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
But Engine raises pretty much the same issues as app developers face.Pro-Samsung #4: Hispanic Leadership Fund, National Black Chamber of Commerce, National Grange (rural communities)Minority advocacy groups Hispanic Leadership Fund and National Black Chamber of Commerce once again teamed up with the National Grange of the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry (advocacy group representing America's farmers and rural communities) to voice their specific concerns over outsized design… [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:25 pm
The footnote in question (footnote 1) can be seen here: As this case comes to the Court, we assume (without deciding) that the state appellate court's decision affirming the exclusion of Maples' testimony was an unreasonable application of Chambers v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
Dollars to doughnuts says that the number of law clerks with tattoos is far, far greater in the chambers of Judges Bybee, Noonan and Clifton -- located in Las Vegas, San Francisco, and Honolulu, respectively -- than in, say, the Virginia Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:00 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce in 1990 and part of McConnell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:13 am
Three more amicus briefs supporting the petition for writ of certiorari in Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]