Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 14,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
The question in the case was whether United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, which requires an organization to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking in order to receive federal funding to provide HIV and AIDS programs overseas, violates the First Amendment.In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 6-2 that the policy requirement violates the First… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights act is unconstitutional, and therefore cannot be used to subject jurisdictions to preclearance requirements. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 5-4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights act is unconstitutional, and therefore cannot be used to subject jurisdictions to preclearance requirements. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:25 am
The question in the case was whether United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, which requires an organization to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking in order to receive federal funding to provide HIV and AIDS programs overseas, violates the First Amendment.In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held by a vote of 6-2 that the policy requirement violates the First… [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 10:44 am
Charges were also announced against high ranking Venezuelan officials including Venezuela’s vice president for the economy, minister of defense and chief supreme court justice, as well as two Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) leaders. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
During oral arguments in In re Bilski, United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts questioned one of the attorneys on the written brief. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
“You are the only institution in the United States that can solve this problem just as democracy is about to get worse because of the way gerrymandering is getting so much worse. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:47 pm
“You are the only institution in the United States that can solve this problem just as democracy is about to get worse because of the way gerrymandering is getting so much worse. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
This prompted a telling response from Chief Justice John Roberts, who described the parties’ battle of analogous provisions as “almost a wash. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
Tribe also noted that he is urging all states, through their chief justices, to establish access to justice commissions. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 pm
An excerpt from the statement by Chief Prosecutor Brig. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
”Justice Kennedy’s civil procedure jurisprudence generally was consistent with Chief Justice John Roberts’s efforts to limit access to the courts. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
But Chief Justice Kem Thompson Frost offered up a concurrence suggesting the law and science are out of whack:In the forty-three years since the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the Biggers factors, scientists have been studying whether these factors accurately predict the reliability of a witness’s identification. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:18 am
Here's the summary of the book, from the publisher: William Howard Taft never wanted to be president and yearned instead to serve as chief justice of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:05 pm
Here's the quote from United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Newby has said that he will run for Chief Justice in 2020. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm
The Court left open the issue of whether an ATS claim might appropriately be asserted against a corporation based upon acts occurring outside the United States, but in some way touching and concerning the United States. [read post]
