Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 48,938
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
** See, also, York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The recent case out of the Eastern District of Virginia federal court, Strata Solar LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
** See, also, York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:48 am
Sky UK Limited v Riverstone Management Agency Limited [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:03 pm
Conclusion As I said prior to the collapse of one of the largest noncompliant crypto intermediaries that cost investors billions of dollars, meaningful engagement with the SEC is always welcome, and I look forward to working with crypto projects and intermediaries that wish to comply with the law. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:25 pm
Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
Fleming (v) the basis for the assertion in the both the Decision and Review Letter that Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
” Olson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
It paints the picture of a rotten corporate culture, desperate to escape accountability at all costs. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
If a business does not qualify to file under Subchapter V for any reason, then initiating the bankruptcy process under Subchapter V will lead to both unnecessary costs and unnecessary delays. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
The first page of the non-precedential custody and contempt decision in T.J.N. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Welfare in Benefit-Cost Analysis: The Case of Government Funding by Zachary D. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 5:56 pm
Also, the employee could also file a direct civil action against the employer for other costs and damages, including the equivalent of a permanent disability award under the WCA.The court ruled that the Exclusivity Rule bars an action against the employer for negligence. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm
The post Case Review – Ellcar Ventures Ltd. v MacLeod, 2023 BCSC 2095 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
“The SEC entirely disregarded the impact of one rule on the other, including by failing to conduct a sufficient cost-benefit analysis of both rules’ cumulative impact. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
Any actions to withdraw or amend Section 18 unfairness rules on the basis of cost-benefit analysis would require a majority vote of sitting commissioners. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
If there appears to be no direct cost to any single individual, there is a social cost. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Given that businesses want, and need, to make money, it was justified to make concessions to prejudice, even at the cost of equality. [read post]
