Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 5:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
Cross-border lenders are not required to hold a banking license, but the Brazilian borrower must register a cross-border credit transaction in the Registry of Financial Transactions (Registro de Operações Financeiras – “ROF”) through the Central Bank of Brazil’s electronic information system (SISBACEN) prior to any disbursement. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:52 am
Sichelstiel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:41 am
Israeli), Fawzy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:23 am
In response to the recent Equal Protection challenge to ICWA by a small number of states in Haaland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
The court went to on state that if Moore would like, he can cross examine her during her testimony. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 10:43 am
However, the EAT went on to allow the respondents’ cross appeal against the tribunals decision regarding jurisdiction of the Equality Act. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:47 am
In applying the two-stage test for jurisdiction set out in Ewert v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
Facts: This case (Ploss v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Grace v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
” Siegel focuses on what such an argument might look like in the context of constitutional arguments about liberty and equality in the family, but she also touches on how it might have improved upon the male-centered analysis of federalism in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am
It would only be relevant when examining novelty, the test for which is cross-sectoral.Though this ruling was sharply criticised by scholars and practitioners (including The IPKat’s post here), the General Court’s approach in fact reflected the one taken in the earlier drafts of the Design Regulation.As Ruhl and Tolkmitt remind us, Member States had planned to use different categories of prior designs for examining novelty and for examining individual character. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
Stanley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
ShareIn 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
