Search for: "DAVID STEPHENS" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2017, 4:50 am by SHG
Stephens’ problem isn’t twitter, but people. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Justice Stephen G. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm by David Kopel
(Stephen Maturen/Getty Images) Can the family of Philando Castile sue the St. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer and Judges Sri Srinivasan, David Tatel and Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
" In today's edition of The Los Angeles Times, David G. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from David Alan Sklansky at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:54 pm
" Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that "Supreme Court suggests constitutional right to Facebook, other social media. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:56 am by Amy Howe
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – believed that courts should be able to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:09 am by Mari Cheney
Further Reading: David S. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Katz’s review of David Callahan’s The Givers. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Social media Another trend we are noticing is the number of defamation claims that relate to social media: Facebook: * Heather Reid v Stan Dukic – $180,000 for “irrational and ranting posts”, ACT. * Kenneth Rothe v David Scott – $150,000 for an accusation of paedophilia, NSW. * Kelly v Levick – $10,000 for an accusation of being a “money crazed bitch” by her husband, Queensland. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:38 am by Ilya Somin
Parts of the court’s statutory analysis on nationality discrimination follow reasoning first laid out – I believe – by David Bier of the Cato Institute, in assessing Trump’s initial travel ban. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[David Henderson, EconLib; Benjamin Parker, Weekly Standard; Stephen Bainbridge] Supreme Court, 9-0, rebuffs SEC: yes, disgorgement is a penalty and statute of limitations applies to it [Theresa Gabaldon/SCOTUSBlog (statutes of limitations “vital to the welfare of society,” per Sotomayor), Bainbridge and more, Thaya Brook Knight and Ilya Shapiro/Cato] Allan Meltzer, R.I.P. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:03 am by INFORRM
 The Particulars of Claim are available on Lawtel [£] 19 July 2017, David v Hosany, listed for 4 days. [read post]