Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 1441 - 1460 of 28,896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 2:37 pm by centerforartlaw
By Murphy Yanbing Chen Introduction—Copyright and Creative Commons Licensing Where does creativity come from? [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Rose Hughes
Under recent Boards of Appeal EPO case law, the technical effect does not always even have to be mentioned in the application as filed in order to be relied on for inventive step (IPKat). [read post]
Unlike the California Consumer Privacy Act, the UCPA does not apply to personal data collected in the employment or commercial context. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Nevertheless, without any effort thereafter at communicating with the undersigned, E/C/SA proceeded to file the Motion on September 1, 2023 (see DOAH Docket ID 12). [read post]
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled 6-1 on Friday that the mandatory minimum sentence for child luring is unconstitutional as it violates the right against cruel and unusual punishment under Section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm by Alden Abbott
The AI Order’s Regulatory Provisions Introductory Overview (Sections 1-3) Section 1 (“Purpose”) announces that the AI order is intended to advance a coordinated, federal-government-wide approach to “governing the development and use of AI safely and responsibly. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 3:04 pm by News Desk
The Malichita brand cantaloupes were sold between Oct. 22 and Nov. 1. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Filip Radzikowski
However, only recently has it experienced an exceptional surge in popularity in Asia and the Middle East[1] and recently it is getting footing in European and US markets. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:42 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Meanwhile Colombian President Gustavo Petro announced on X, formerly Twitter, that “if Israel does not stop the massacre of the Palestinian people, we cannot remain there. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:19 am by Lucie Fortune (Bristows)
As there was no allegation of actual or threatened infringement in the Netherlands, the Court did not have jurisdiction under Article 33(1)(a), and instead needed to look to Article 33(1)(b). [read post]