Search for: "Day v. United States"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 22,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 9:09 am
The hospital's contract with Medicare has no such mandatory billing policy as it apparently does with United HealthCare, and therefore given that Medicare was in fact the primary payer in this case, the hospital's election is governed by Medicare law and not state contract law. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
In PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:58 am
., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 3:27 am
This is the day that Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
I believe that it is more likely than not to prevail in a later case in which it installs a GPS monitor without a warrant and tracks the individual for only a couple of days. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
The Harris v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 pm
v=gH476CxJxfg Today was a good day. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
(H.K.) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
I have just received a copy of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s first Memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps regarding the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier today in Bilski v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
On June 4 I was in Washington and took the oath to join the bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Here are the final four:In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 10:44 am
Gaetz it cited “My Cousin Vinny” and in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Tricon Energy Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:03 am
Finding that the Village violated equal protection rights of day laborers seeking employment on the streets of the Village of Mamaroneck, the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York directed the parties to submit briefs on the issue of appropriate remedies for the day laborers. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:03 am
Finding that the Village violated equal protection rights of day laborers seeking employment on the streets of the Village of Mamaroneck, the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York directed the parties to submit briefs on the issue of appropriate remedies for the day laborers. [read post]
