Search for: "Deal v. Deal" Results 1441 - 1460 of 38,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 9:05 am
”But the court also stressed that plea deals cannot be “overturned on a whim. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Z v Z [2011] EWHC 2878 (Fam) is, I believe, the first reported pre-nuptial agreement case since Radmacher v Granatino.The facts: Both parties are French. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  In addition, the Court has now scheduled all of the same-sex marriage cases for consideration at its November 20 Conference; that includes eight petitions dealing with the Defense of Marriage Act, one dealing with California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage, and one dealing with an Arizona law similar to DOMA that restricts marital benefits for state workers to opposite-sex married couples only. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Tessa Shepperson
 However here are a few comments: The 2007 Court of Appeal decision the case of Aerospace v Thames Water is about the circumstances under which a court will made an award to a party regarding staff costs of investigating and dealing with a wrongful claim. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:32 am
Jones III described it in his 38-page opinion in Westport Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 8:42 am by The Clinton Law Firm
The Terra Museum sued its former attorneys, DLA Piper, for legal malpractice arising out of a real estate deal gone bad. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:09 pm by Michel-Adrien
" Reaction to the 2017 Federal Court decision includes:Court Decision a Big Win for Creators and Publishers (Access Copyright, July 12, 2017)Ignoring the Supreme Court: Federal Court Judge Hands Access Copyright Fair Dealing Victory (blog post by Michael Geist, University of Ottawa, July 13, 2017) Access Copyright v York University (Fair Dealing in Education blog, July 13, 2017)Access Copyright v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Howard Knopf
Bloom, who also represented the plaintiffs in the CCH v LSUC litigation, is currently representing the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC), the lead objector in the tariff proceedings brought by Access Copyright now pending before the Copyright Board. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 5:39 am
At issue in this case, Environmental Defense v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 5:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari [Order List, PDF] in Arave v. [read post]