Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 6:28 am
The problem that arises for instance in cartel prosecution, namely that punitive fines undermine existing leniency programmes, does not apply to violations of the behavioural provisions of the DMA. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
Does the government have to tell consumers when it searches their email accounts or accesses their data? [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
The UK Supreme Court decided, in the 2018 Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:25 am
(id. at 120-121)This ruling is great news for Wisconsin voters, but what could it mean for Virginia voters? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Reasons not to borrow: (1) Wrong idea, like Whelan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
As the Supreme Court explained during the Great Depression, “Emergency does not create power. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
Hong Kong: Freedom of the (Entertainment) Press: Part 1, Data Privacy and Public Interest – David Ma
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm
It is a case of the co-existence of two great principles that needs to be carefully balanced. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
” All of that said, “no one should expect great changes in litigation practice as a consequence of Leidos. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
And does such a requirement apply to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
You have great electronic evidence but can you authenticate it? [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 12:42 pm
” Gillson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
Looks like a great investment? [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
That political role invested in capacity building is both the great benefit and the source of the great caution to this helpdesk enterprise. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
That is, they confuse "original meaning" with "original expected application. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:32 pm
They voiced that it did not help them do their job, and they expected good, thorough substantive cross-examinations. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
The case was Nixon v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:09 pm
" Forsyth County v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Without presuming to question Judge Marrero’s legal reasoning, there is a great deal of precedent to support the opposite view, that the Martin Act does preempt private action. [read post]
