Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 7,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 7:42 am
Superior Court for determining whether workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 1:13 pm
The Superior Court denied his request and he appealed. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 7:05 am
” It is in this new context that Justice Myers of the Ontario Superior Court, as the case management judge, rendered a new decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
Superior Court (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 262, 271.) [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
Superior Court, the court found that "The uncertain state of the law with respect to meal and rest period claims was likewise a substantial concern" which favors settlement approval. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am
On May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
” That’s the way it was under common law until the 1863 English court case of Taylor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
On remand, it will be interesting to see what the state court does, given what many observers see as their recent resistant approach on directions from the high Court on remands. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
Here is his response: "The Supreme Court decided Carey v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:47 am
The superior court instead adopted a congressional plan created by the court-appointed special masters to be used for the 2022 midterm congressional elections. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 am
" Well, now that is happening, in a case called Ekren v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
On December 10, 2020, the Court held in Carney v. [read post]
Rehearing granted and modified opinion issued in arbitration case: Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Corp.
2 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
On November 23, 2011, the Court of Appeal issued a new opinion on rehearing in Sanchez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
However, as elucidated by the Kwikset court’s discussion, it does not necessarily follow that they did not suffer economic harm. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm
The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:55 am
In the case, County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:05 pm
Superior Court, until that decision has issued this Court must proceed as best it can. [read post]
