Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 1441 - 1460 of 27,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
The first examiner indicated that in his opinion claim 1 now on file suffers from the same deficiency as claim 1 as originally filed. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:57 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Meanwhile, in late February 2010, Lannett submitted its own NDA (NDA No. 201517) to FDA for Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution, 100 mg per 5 mL (20 mg per mL), which NDA was not granted a 6-month priority review as was Roxane’s NDA. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
”[5] Legal arguments against plain packaging laws have been raised on the grounds that it violates Art 20 of TRIPS, 1994. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
He is an expert in employer communication systems and helps employers reduce their workers comp costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Feb. 20, 2014).Issues[1] Claim construction and Infringement[Whether the district court erred in finding that claim 1 was infringed because it] construed the claim term “fine granules having an average particle diameter of 400 μm or less” . . . [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:06 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 (WEDNESDAY, 17 MARCH 2021)BREAKING NEWS: G 1/21 - Exclusion and objection of the chairman of the Enlarged Board, but not of other members (THURSDAY, 20 MAY 2021) [read post]
  Appellants filed their revised brief on June 1, 2021 in which they argue that the FTC does not have the authority to impose some of the remedies that the FTC has imposed. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:34 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Does the mechanism of the lump-sum settlement, N.J.S.A., 34:15-20, ie. [read post]