Search for: "Downs v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 36,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
How many times do you see laws struck down as violating the Fifteenth Amendment? [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:42 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:13 am
Google and Malandrucco v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:28 pm
Introduction Several years ago the United States Supreme Court handed down Garcetti v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:07 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Thursday, including the consolidated cases of Davenport v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:46 am
Alabama [JURIST report], which struck down state laws that mandated a life sentence for capital offenses by minors, applies retroactively. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:54 pm
” In 1995, the Supreme Court handed down Kyles v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:30 am
In the case of McMillen v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
Last year’s decision in ITN Flix, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments in Braidwood v Becerra, a case challenging the constitutionality of the ACA requirement that most forms of private health coverage include certain recommended preventive services. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 11:48 am
In Association of American Physicians & Surgeons v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:22 am
The following post is by Mark V. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
United States and Ohio v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Had the state just banned condoms or the pill, it's hard to imagine a different outcome.Maybe a harder case would be presented if the state offered a health justification for the ban. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:59 pm
Caldwell Tanks, Inc. v. [read post]
