Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 12,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am
Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:57 am
A public employee’s retirement allowance paid by a public retirement system of this State ruled subject to the provisions of the Son of Sam Law New York State Off. of Victim Servs. v Raucci, 2012 NY Slip Op 04440, Appellate Division, Third Department The issue in this action: Does Retirement and Social Security Law §110* insulate the retirement benefits from a public retirement system of this State from “the broad reach of the Son of Sam Law,… [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Becker, Human Capital (1st ed. 1964); Gary S. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Gabe Roth calls on the court to release information about “which justices … are voting to grant review in the major cases the court is taking,” such as the recently granted abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:23 am
State, 84 Nev. 233, 440 P.2d 893, 895-98 (Nev. 1968); State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:32 am
” Brief of United States, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
Knepper v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:23 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at an upcoming case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
Phipps wrote that in Auld v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
The present decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request read: 1. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
Ed. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:34 am
" Yarborough v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
