Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 1441 - 1460 of 12,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2008, 4:01 am
Green Bay Packers, Inc., No. 00 C 4623, Slip Op. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:09 pm by Clifford D. Hyra
We will call that other business “First User, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
In Re American International Group, Inc., Consolidated Derivative Litigation;  American International Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 8:23 am by Joy Waltemath
The plan’s action to enforce its equitable lien for the amount of paid-out benefits constituted appropriate equitable relief under ERISA, the court held, affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment and attorneys’ fees/costs in favor of the plan sponsor (AirTran Airways, Inc v Elem, September 23, 2014, Pryor, W). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:16 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
We support the EPA’s efforts to finalize the rule in order to reap the significant public health benefits as indicated by the Agency’s analysis. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:57 am by Andrew Levad and Jason Gordon
  Nathan cited several studies in her first complaint, stating that the products’ only active ingredients (hydroxycitric acid and chromium) “are scientifically proven to be incapable of providing [] weight-loss benefits. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:57 am by Andrew Levad and Jason Gordon
  Nathan cited several studies in her first complaint, stating that the products’ only active ingredients (hydroxycitric acid and chromium) “are scientifically proven to be incapable of providing [] weight-loss benefits. [read post]
12 May 2009, 9:25 pm by legalinformatics
Here’s a recent example: within about 3 hours after Chrysler LLC filed its Chapter 11 petition, the claims agent in the case, Epiq Systems, Inc., had the petition, press releases, all first day motions, and a current docket with full text of documents available from its Chrysler case website. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  These include challenges alleging insufficient – or what a panel of generalist judges say is inadequate – cost-benefit analysis. [read post]