Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
I have excerpted a portion of the Kappos post that he titles “Increased Fees v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:36 pm
In the Supreme Court’s 2018 Janus v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
The Court of Appeal ruled Tuesday in Leonard Carder LLP v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:51 pm
The case was Pettway v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:51 pm
The case was Pettway v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:50 am
As to the award of attorneys fees, the Second Department reversed. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
The city demurred on the grounds the complaint was filed outside the 120-day statute of limitations from the date the city council adopted the fee, and further that charging such a fee was in compliance with CEQA pursuant to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. [read post]
RIAA Continues to Fight for $543 in Attorneys Fees over Default Judgment in Elektra v. Santangelo II
14 Aug 2007, 5:02 am
The RIAA continues to fight for its $543 in attorneys fees in connection with the Court's vacating of the default judgment in Elektra v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Oak Found. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:03 pm
The case is Mueggenberg v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
In the first new decision, Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
White] Tags: Fifth Circuit, judges, law enforcement for profit, Louisiana, New Orleans, petty fines and fees [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:32 pm
In Roofers Edge Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:15 am
Click here to read the papers in the lawsuit in DC v Marriott filed June 7, 2017. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
It then sued Candlewood and its principal, Jeffrey Kossak, on Nov. 12 (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
To read the City of Laredo v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:14 am
Gabriel Technologies, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:17 am
The question whether the Holder Rule’s limit on a consumer’s recovery to the “amounts paid by the debtor” under the contract includes the consumer’s attorney’s fees is currently before the California Supreme Court in Pulliam v. [read post]
