Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court finally heard oral argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am
And the German and Italian versions were different again. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:01 am
The lawsuit: Knox v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:34 am
Leveque Bros. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:30 pm
United States Fire Insurance Co and Others v Icicle Seafoods Inc, case no. 22-35024 in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-35024/22-35024-2022-12-06.pdf? [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:03 am
Gulyás stated that Hungary has a claim after the EC reimbursed other Schengen border states. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm
But over time, they argued, the battlefield has changed and they believed the threat that President Vladimir V. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:21 pm
These shortcomings make CAFA perpetually ripe for misinterpretation and seemingly unintended application and were recently highlighted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Cappuccitti v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:05 am
In Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
This weblog has not been uniformly impressed with FIFA's intellectual property activities over the years (see eg "Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken", here; "FIFA's unfair catenaccio on World Cup's IP", here; "Ferrero v FIFA (in the World Cup trade mark dispute) -- 1:0 says the German BGH", here; "Put those vuvuzelas away, here comes FIFA", here; "Pants off in Anti-Ambush Marketing Frenzy", here;… [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* BREAKING: CJEU says that fair compensation for private copying cannot be funded through general state budgetThe CJEU has considered the freedom of implementing the private copying exception, which may be broad but not so broad as to allow for fair compensation to be funded from the general state budget. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
(For an interesting case on this issue, see the famous US Sixth Court of Appeals decision in Mozert v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Condor and Filvern v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
For example, Article 79 of the German Basic Law forbids any amendment that would change the protection afforded for human dignity (Article 1) or the democratic character of the German state (Article 20). [read post]
