Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The question whether the administrative exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional was the subject of a circuit split—a conflict among federal appellate courts—that is often a factor that motivates the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and review a case.The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:41 pm by elizabeth.howell
Mother did not waive superior custodial rights - published opinion from Ky Court of Appeals elizabeth.howell Mon, 06/03/2019 - 18:41 Read more about Mother did not waive superior custodial rights - published opinion from Ky Court of AppealsKruger v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:53 am by Jeff Welty
He appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the following exchange took place: THE COURT: The State has a motion to amend. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 5:38 am by Russell D. Knight
File an appeal If you believe the court misapplied the law, you can file an appeal with the superior court in your jurisdiction. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  Yes, the English courts do refuse preliminary injunctions from time-to-time. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:49 am
about SCOTUS's grant of cert in Ritzen Group v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:31 pm by admin
This case was an appeal from the decision of the Superior Court of Justice, in which the lower court granted summary judgment to the defendants in a beer marketing class action case commenced under the Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, B292416 (Opinion filed 4/16/19). [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:21 pm
This time, his request was granted and the current action was filed. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am by Benjamin Beaton
On summary judgment, the district court held that respondeat superior and constructive notice could not link a professor’s discriminatory motive to the college’s adverse action. [read post]