Search for: "Harper v. Harper" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  Take two recent cases, that of Aaron Banks defamation case against the journalist, Carole Cadwalladr, and the actions brought by a number of wealthy Russians against the author, Catherine Belton, and the publisher Harper Collins over allegations in Belton’s book, Putin’s People. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by sevach
 A la vista del caso me vino a la mente la frase de Atticus, el abogado de la célebre novela  “ Matar un ruiseñor” (Harper Lee, 1960) cuando dice: ”Los ruiseñores no hacen otra cosa que crear música para que la disfrutemos. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
  If the parents do not have sufficient resources to satisfy both brothers' needs at the same time, their decision about who to benefit will almost always reflect family values (little "F" little "V"). [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
Image: Wikimedia Commons (public domain) KYEstates is pleased to share welcome news of a taxpayer win in Estate of Black v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
At a recent Columbia Law School colloquium, participants posed a foundational question: How do corporate law standards of fiduciary duty relate to what scientists call the “climate emergency”? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:16 am by José Manuel Gómez Porchini
Y para poder decir un discurso válido, lógico, es necesario tener un bagaje cultural amplio que soporte a quien habla. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]