Search for: "Harrington" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am by Michael O'Hear
Finally, On Point weighs in on the Court’s other habeas decision last week, Harrington v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:28 pm by Michael O'Hear
  In my previous post, I discussed the habeas issues in one case, Harrington v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm by Law Lady
Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Section 2254(d), which, as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, limits the availability of federal habeas relief for claims previously “adjudicated on the merits” in state court proceedings, applies to petition for federal habeas relief when state court's order denying relief is unaccompanied by an opinion explaining the court's reasoning -- Petitioner was not entitled to the habeas relief… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm by Michael O'Hear
 Today, in this post, I’ll focus on what the Court had to say about habeas law in one of the decisions, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Nelson, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Nelson, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:11 am by Jeff Gamso
“As the documents included in the grievance demonstrate, Judge Keller's statements before the federal court and her statements to the (conduct) commission were in complete contradiction of each other,” said Jim Harrington, executive director of the Texas Civil Rights Project. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:35 pm by Jason Mazzone
Today, the Supreme Court decided Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:43 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Habeas Corpus Standard of review 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) applies to a habeas corpus petition, even though the state court’s order was unaccompanied by an opinion explaining the court’s reasoning. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday ruled [opinion, PDF] in Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:32 am by John Elwood
  That was very much on display in Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in today’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]