Search for: "Head v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 13,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
On Monday, November 14, 2011, the United States Supreme Court announced it would take up the constitutionality of the new healthcare law, which has been dubbed “Obamacare. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
The Supreme Court declined to address the problem head on when given the opportunity in the 1996 case of Whren v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
The ruling below, which upheld the state law, is reversed and remanded;" Giles v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:34 am
Citing People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 10:26 pm
This recall expansion includes 71 products produced between May 10, 2024, and July 29, 2024, under Defendant’s Boar’s Head and Old Country brand names. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
MCMILLAN V. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:23 am
State will be heard before the SCOTUS on Wed., March 26th. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35 both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Every state. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:37 am
Since this case was decided by a 3-2 vote, it is sure to wind up in the New York Court of Appeals.The case is In the Matter of Bursch v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:11 am
Lenz v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:57 pm
Burns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:45 pm
" Real Alaskans know that, while there is an official First Dude of the State, there is no Secretary of State. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
” Cavazos v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm
” Cavazos v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
