Search for: "Holme v. Holme"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 2,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Ali v Birmingham CC.The Court of Appeal gave these arguments short shrift. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
S. 644, 655 (1929) (Holmes,J., dissenting). [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Werner v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:46 pm
The case is Brown v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm
Hudson, the landlady of Sherlock Holmes, was a long-suffering woman. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Bradwell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm
Let’s take a look at some questionable trial practices, as found in the case of Baker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
Easily the most effective change to improve police oversight in Houston and other civil service cities, without costing the taxpayers a dime, would simply be to re-open police disciplinary files; hundreds of non-civil service cities and every Texas Sheriff operate just fine under the Public Information Act, and so would civil service cities if they were brought back under its umbrella.Another key, too-often neglected transparency issue: Former Harris County DA Johnny Holmes and the Texas … [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:40 am
"Holmes had the carriage stopped. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:22 am
The world is more complicated than Sherlock Holmes thought. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am
Indeed, these three unresolved issues were explicitly named by Judge Holmes of the Tenth Circuit, concurring in Bishop v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
It was unconstitutional to retroactively apply Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) to a defendant who, at age 19, had pleaded guilty to a sex offense under a state diversionary statute, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled.In People v Temelkoski, the Michigan Supreme Court emphasized that, when prosecuting crimes, the state must adhere to the promises it makes to defendants who waive their right to a jury trial and plead guilty to a criminal offense under the… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:24 am
If one's best analysis is that the court decided X v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:40 am
Another view is the Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Tersigni v. [read post]
