Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Doe, 2016 FC 681 https://t.co/Owz9woffUe -> Ireland: Orders against social networks to identify anonymous posters of defamatory content (Muwema v Facebook) https://t.co/5FGpxisZXy -> Brevan Howard v Reuters, Gagging order upheld by the Court of Appeal in breach of confidence case https://t.co/W4LRTYYY2B -> Is Google Buying Policy Through Academia? [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jodoin, 2017 SCC 26 [1] This appeal concerns the scope of the courts’ power to award costs[1] against a lawyer personally in a criminal proceeding. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:07 am by Steve Lubet
There was no right to a jury or appeal, and the alleged fugitives were not permitted to testify in their own defense. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed Friedman — despite the fact that the companies were reportedly well on their way to integration — ruling that Friedman “underestimated the FTC’s likelihood of success on the merits. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:46 am by Joseph D. Kearney
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (whose scholarly and judicial career was recently celebrated by the Yale Journal on Regulation, but no link is available), points us to the future, sketching the possible relevance of the Interstate Commerce Act’s paradigm for modern debates over regulation (“The Interstate Commerce Act as a Model of Regulation”); and James B. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit requested supplemental briefing on the extent to which it should give deference to the precedential interpretation of a Patent Act joinder provision that the Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) adopted in Proppant Express Investments, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:21 pm by familoo
By a majority (Briggs LJ dissenting), the Court of Appeal upheld the order of Sir Hugh Bennett and dismissed the wife’s appeal. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, in conflict with the decisions of three courts of appeals, erred in exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the Court of Appeal has power to substitute for any amount of damages awarded in the High Court such amount as it considers appropriate (see section 13 of the Act (also here) read with section 74 of the Court of Appeal Act, 2014 (alsohere)). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 24 February 2015 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Huff v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  The court of appeals concluded that applying this law in Mississippi would have the effect of closing the state’s one existing abortion clinic and would therefore impose an undue burden on women seeking to exercise their constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:53 am by Seán Binder
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS – TRUMP LEGAL MATTERS Former Vice President Mike Pence will not appeal a ruling compelling him to testify before a grand jury investigating former President Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 election, an adviser to Pence said yesterday. [read post]