Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
In Towles v Towles, the Supreme Court held that a wife who agreed not to sue her husband in order to reconcile with him would not be held to that agreement, as it was against public policy. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Soon after, it became apparent that the wife was not re-investing dividends, and the case devolved into a referee's search for assets. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:33 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
In a press release issued today, attorneys for a husband and wife tax fraud whistleblowers, expressed optimism that President Trump’s pick for Secretary of Treasury Steve Mnuchin would show support for the IRS Whistleblower Office by not appealing a the Tax Court’s decision in Whistleblower 21276-13W v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 3:26 pm by Gregory Forman
Wife admitted that patients were drawn to the practice because of Husbands efforts in the community. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
In fact, the concept of separate maintenance stems from Mississippi's public policy recognizing a husband's continued duty to financially support his wife and family even during periods of spousal separation--especially when the wife is the non-earning spouse and children are involved. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:43 pm by pfriedman
A federal court in Massachusetts today struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), which states that for purposes of determining rights to federal benefits “the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ’spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:35 am by Burton A. Padove
” The agreement was drafted by husbands divorce lawyer, and wife chose not to retain one, despite having the ability to easily afford it. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:14 pm by Kirk Jenkins
At the hearing on the wifes petition, the husband disclosed that he had received a $300,000 lump-sum workers’ compensation settlement the year before. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 3:53 pm
App.2008) Husband appealed an order denying his challenge to a garnishment served by his former Wife on several insurance providers who owed money to Husband's medical practice. [read post]
2 May 2008, 5:30 am
  Plaintiff demonstrated that the defendant attorney represented both husband and wife, and was therefore burdened by a conflict of interest. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 2:35 pm by Shahram Miri
In that case, a husband was convicted of burglarizing a home which he and his estranged wife owned jointly. [read post]