Search for: "IN THE DRINK, INC." Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
Macke complained that he had to close one of his courses as a result of increasing expenses (including taxes) and decreasing revenues, based, in part from competition by a nearby city course operated by Golf Management, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
So you then need to go to case law to see how the courts interpret and apply that distinction.A seminal case distinguishing a food from a drug is Nutrilab, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am by John J. Sullivan
Teva Pharmas., USA, Inc., 2012 WL 5364392 (M.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:47 am by WIMS
Several scholars have applied different methodologies to examine the relationships between energy consumption and economic growth of individual and groups of countries and to analyze the. . .Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
It also owns the trade mark “Deep Throat” for alcoholic beverages and energy drinks. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm by Larry
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by David DePaolo
This time it's the FIM ENI World Superbike Championships USA round at Laguna Seca in Monterey, CA.I think, to me, this is the ultimate celebration of freedom: fast, loud, risky, color, excitement, food, drink, thrills. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:56 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
  $20,000 each Singleton v Leisureworld Inc. (2008), 166 ACWS (3d) 886, 2008 CarswellOnt 2128 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm by WIMS
National Marine Fisheries Service (Click here for details)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:42 am by admin
  Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. developed the device. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]