Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Revisited recently (w/more emphasis on what child’s world has already taught them about trusting promises about the future). [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s a more interesting problem than it looks b/c of worries about over- and underdeterrence. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:01 am by opseo
  If you owe back child or spousal support, the stay may not be as effective but you have the chance to get other debts discharged and work on getting support payments made. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Platnick outweighs the public interest in protecting Ms. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:28 am by William Ford
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board)   The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The position remains, as laid down by Re S (A Child) ([2005] 1 AC 593) [17], with neither Article 8 nor Article 10 having precedence; a balance must be struck in each case where both rights are in play, giving due weight to the importance of open justice. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:45 pm by Russell D. Knight
In Illinois, child support looks at gross income and the statute specifically states that “’gross income’ means the total of all income from all sources. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:18 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That means that Column A + or – Column B should equal Column C. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:34 pm by Georgialee Lang
” Upon her former husband’s death, she brought a court action in regards to her interest in the life insurance policy, a step that revealed that Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
Oscar C., 192 A.D.2d 280, 285, 600 N.Y.S.2d 957 [noting the tribe=s right to intervene in a child neglect proceeding]), made the same request. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
At trial, eyewitness Davina Sparks was called to testify; but she was a veil-wearing Muslim woman, and (to quote the government's brief), [C]ounsel objected to Ms. [read post]