Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 9,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm
The judge disagrees with this interpretation of Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:01 am
"They're all close calls now. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Then re-read this nonsense. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
This being so the judge held that Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 11:24 am
Plaintiff arguably couldn't make a particularly strong showing in that regard, and defendant didn't really specify how the design of the accused products evolved over the years. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 3:10 am
"It is not designed to become the federal lender of last resort, a mega-agency to subsidize bad loans. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
Last week, after more than a year of drafting following oral argument, and nearly two years after the original District Court order, a Third Circuit panel (Chief Judge Scirica and Judges Fisher and Greenberg) issued their magnum opus on pleading Section 1 antitrust violations after Twombly and RICO Act "enterprises" after Boyle in the consolidated Multi-District Litigation In re: Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:39 am
Ever the careful legal technocrat, our Chief Judge has cited to 5 U.S.C 6103 for the authority to designate an additional day off from work when a holiday falls on a Saturday or Sunday. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
If so, you’re already one up on Arters. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:05 pm
In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:56 am
To compare Survey 1 with competing Survey 2, or Expert Linguistic Opinion 1 with competing Expert Linguistic Opinion 2, one has to know something about surveys, and about survey design, and about linguistics — and judges, simply, haven’t the faintest idea what they’re talking about (nor should they be expected to have the faintest idea what they’re talking about) when it comes to matters like that. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:46 am
The U.K. judge ruling that the Samsung Galaxy Tab did not infringe on the iPad was cooler: "They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:44 am
Judges no longer will have any say in an offender's classification, and whether or not the person is likely to re-offend is immaterial. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Here’s an important lesson for practicing lawyers: even if you and your trial judge are in agreement, that doesn’t mean you get a pass if a new judge takes over or you’re case gets challenged on appeal. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
“You’re saying the special counsel is taking inconsistent positions, but aren’t you just doing the same thing, flip-flopped? [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:48 am
” In re I-Coat Company, LLC, Serial Nos. 86802467, 86802618, and 86802733 (June 7, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
The key Federal Circuit case on point is the non-precedential In re Oneplus Tech. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
They’re just being like that! [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Depending on judicial predilection (Judge Bechtle didn’t; Judge Weinstein does), MDLs often include summary judgment and (less frequently) other dispositive motions concerning individuals or groups of plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:46 pm
” In other words, Omega attempted to use the copyrighted Globe Design to decrease competition in the U.S. importation and distribution of its watches by it and its authorized dealers—an obvious leveraging of a copyright to control an area outside its limited monopoly on the design. [read post]
