Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 1441 - 1460 of 7,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm by Evan Reesor
They’re also trying to get people test results in as little as 6 hours rather than 2-3 days. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm by Evan Reesor
They’re also trying to get people test results in as little as 6 hours rather than 2-3 days. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:24 am by Florence Campbell Jones
If you have any questions, or for further information please reach out to Nicola Kerr, Mark Dorff, Charlotte Møller or Max Binney. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:34 am
" In re Medline Industries, Inc., Serial No. 87680078 (March 25, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).The Board observed that this case is "unusual" because the TTAB has issued only one predecential decision involving the issue of likelihood of confusion between two single-color marks in the nearly 25 years following the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Qualitex: namely, In re Cook Med. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:02 pm by Steve Baird®
As I’m sure you appreciate, the answer is highly fact dependent/context specific. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
But sometimes they’re deadly. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm by James Hastings
  The Board proceeded with its analysis of the likelihood of confusion factors set forth in In re E. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Property owner: I'm not doing that; I'm pleading the Fifth. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Samuel Rebo
John Hyten, testified, “I’m a big supporter [of the treaty] .... [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:10 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Just getting it in under the wire – I wanted to take the opportunity to mark the occasion of Zen & the Art of Legal Networking’s 11th Anniversary. [read post]