Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
"You're an asshole" understates the appropriate critique. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
Of course that's what you're doing. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
It's way to big of a risk to re-empanel them again after two years of sitting at home. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 3:40 pm
If your potential spouse has a huge judgment against him/her, and you've got assets, of course you're going to do a prenup. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Tejeda wanted was for "Obama to admit to his face, 'Ay bro, you're a project.'" Seems a reasonable request. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
I'm not a thousand percent certain that you can permissibly do that in the context of criminal statutes, since there's arguably a Due Process right to be notified of what you're allowed or not allowed to do under penalty of incarceration. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
Which is not exactly what you want as your campaign slogan, and what you're probably hugely worried might be your electoral opponent's campaign slogan against you.But as a "Talk to the hand" argument, sure, it doctrinally works. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
"Given the routine nature of these assessments in criminal cases, Justice Hoffstadt might as well have said: "We want the Supreme Court to grant review in this case, so we're going to essentially make 'em do it now. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
" It's always good to remember that we're dealing with people. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:52 pm
You're 39 weeks pregnant. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
They're sentenced to 30-to-life because one (indeed, two) of their accomplices died.And there's more.As is often the case, there's a plea deal for some of the participants, who then agree to testify against the others. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
., where defendant agreed to plead guilty to X offense, in return for Y sentence, but now seeks relief (as authorized by Proposition 47) to reduce the X offense to a misdemeanor and hence only have to serve a sentence of less-than-Y.So does the passage of Proposition 47 allow the prosecution to retroactively withdraw from the plea agreement, even after the defendant has (as here) served years in prison, or do we assume that both parties (the prosecution and the defense) are bound because… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
The reader is basically left entirely in the dark about what we're talking about.The opinion also, strangely, feels the need to drop a footnote that defines what a credit card is. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
But if you were fine with putting the guy in jail for 14 months and then getting "supervision" for the next 14 months in the community, I'm not sure why you're all of the sudden unhappy with the guy being in jail for 14 months and then getting immediately deported.Seems like the latter thing is good for everyone -- or at least everyone in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
You're instead required only to produce sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could conclude that, yep, this stuff more likely than not came from the guy. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:44 pm
You're instead left with the distinct impression that the County doesn't want the defendant to know how jurors are selected precisely because it's worried that they'll discover that the process does not, in fact, work the way it should.The whole "sunlight is the best disinfectant" principle seems quite applicable here. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:57 pm
When you're a lawyer who's arguing in the Court of Appeal that education about Jim Crow laws should be more limited, it's probably fairly damaging to reveal that you don't even know yourself what "Jim Crow" entails. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
RPTR. 338 (Cal. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:54 pm
Here, however,"the plaintiff does not allege the City's announcement of an intention to condemn or its promise to re-file the condemnation action somehow reduced the value of the Property. [read post]
