Search for: "In re Brooks"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 2,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2017, 9:47 am
We’re all careful to try to avoid the dreaded overdraft fee. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:29 am
Unfortunately for us, that one person finding fault with everything has essentially become the caveman “art critic” from Mel Brooks’ “History of the World Part One. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
David Brooks argued that Harvard missed a teachable moment. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
We DON’T do that if you’re a partner. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
Brooks Brothers cuts can be a bit boxier, but they’re also a great source for mid-level suits; Talbots has also recently started making less boxy cuts for suits.Expensive. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Family law forms -- Amendments -- Name change petitions
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:18 am
Brooks' work. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:01 am
In re Shaw, 204 S.W.3d 9, 15 (Tex. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:59 pm
” Brooke ended up signing an exclusivity agreement with the Guardian so that she would not scoop the newspaper on its coverage or take the cables elsewhere. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:53 pm
$1998 No, no, I didn’t forget a decimal point: these are a pair of $2,000 gator loafers from Brooks Brothers. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:51 pm
 You want to re-think that line and get back to me? [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
” In Re Marriage of Brooks 138 Ill. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:26 am
Cantie, it’s my understanding that you’re going to waive a jury trial and try the case to me. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:17 am
It’s a restriction that you’re bound by. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm
In 2020, in the In re: Robinhood Outage Litigation, the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:27 pm
And as that article notes, that is the topic of a recent book by Peter Singer and Emerson Brooking, who observed that “social media is being mobilized as an adjunct to kinetic combat. [read post]
