Search for: "In re Roger S"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
Perhaps tipping her hand, Judge Rogers asked DePue to concede that al-Nashiri would be able to bring these claims back before the D.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Simple & straightforward Rogers-like test = great. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:32 am
You're doing Paris this spring. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
MPC and Woodward’s principal place of business was in Illinois. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Also, what about examining rigor if you’re going to go substantive route? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
John's Andreas Delgado ADCasteleiro Durham (UK) Michelle M. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:03 pm
In any event, you’ve opened the door to it, and we’re going to proceed. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
Circuit (Henderson, Rogers, & Pillard, JJ.) is set to hear oral argument in In re al-Nashiri, the latest in a long-line of pre-trial disputes arising out of the Guantánamo military commission proceedings against Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed al-Nashiri, who is accused of involvement in two terrorist attacks and one attempted attack—most notoriously the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole that resulted in the deaths of 17 American sailors. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Wozencraft, 15 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 1994) (use of undercover police officer’s identity in film protected by First Amendment); Rogers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
CRISTIL ROGERS, No. 14-0279 Per Curiam The Court dealt with what it called “the familiar issue of whether a trial court’s order ... is final for purposes of appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
CRISTIL ROGERS, No. 14-0279 Per Curiam The Court dealt with what it called “the familiar issue of whether a trial court’s order ... is final for purposes of appeal. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
Senators Bill Cardin (D-Md) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) have re-introduced the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (S. 284) aimed at expanding the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:43 pm
As Will Rogers once quipped, if you’re in a hole, stop digging. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
State’s Argument The State first attacks Moore’s argument from a procedural standpoint. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
It's the most I can do. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
So, you make risk-based decisions: What’re the most important things that are absolutely required by law? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:03 pm
Roger Goodman (D-Kirkland), who chairs the Public Safety Committee, agreed, saying it’s unlikely H.B. 1104 will advance. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
Roger Ford is Assistant Professor of Law at the University of New Hampshire School of Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
A Washington Post article on the film explains: Working with an original script by Paul Webb, [director Ava] DuVernay carefully paraphrased King’s oratory, so that the words [actor David] Oyelowo speaks in the film have King’s cadence and meaning, even when they’re not literal. [read post]
