Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2" Results 1441 - 1460 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
" Subtract one person from that list; a New Yorker identifying himself as John Doe, who clever people quickly outed as businessman Jeffrey Lemerond, has now filed a lawsuit, claiming that he was humiliated by his appearance in the film. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
The civil action also names John Does 1-3 to eventually rope in defendants “whose identifies and citizenship are presently unkown,” but who “were involved in the manufacture, distribution, and/or sales that caused Plaintiffs’ associated injuries. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:47 am
 Grisham’s non-fiction best seller The Innocent Man chronicled the wrongful prosecution of 2 men charged and convicted of From Friend’s cleverly titled post “Innocent After All These Years? [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:12 am
The estimated downtime is 1-2 hours.We apologize for this inconvenience. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
As an argument of last resort on standing, the government seeks to narrow standing to John Doe #1, the only plaintiff with a family member allegedly affected by the ban. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Two pieces of news from yesterday's Forensic Science Commission meeting in Houston stand out: 1) John Bradley's new, unilateral legal interpretation declaring the FSC couldn't investigate the Todd Willingham case was unanimously rejected, and 2) a committee examining the case said in an interim finding that "flawed science" was presented  in the Willingham case, but no negligence or misconduct by investigators occurred. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:30 am by John Kostyack
 John Kostyack is the executive director of the  National Whistleblower Center A national conversation is underway about whether the President’s actions on the Ukraine matter warrant impeachment – a question on which the National Whistleblower Center does not take a position. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Bruce Khula
Bursch returned to his primary theme, stating that Proposal 2 was distinguishable from Hunter and Seattle because it did not repeal an antidiscrimination law and ending with the assertion that “it does not violate equal protection to require equal treatment. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:43 am by John L. Welch
The Board dismissed this Section 2(e)(1) opposition to registration of the mark HEALTHY HOME VACUUM, finding it not merely descriptive of vacuum cleaners [VACUUM disclaimed]. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:53 am
Here's the recent tally:1) When Bear Sterns is in trouble, the federal govt subsidizes its acquisition by JP Morgan Chase.2) When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in trouble, the federal govt takes them over outright.3) When Lehman Bros. is in trouble, the executive branch of the federal govt does nothing, leaving the bankruptcy court to sort things out.4) When Merrill Lynch is in trouble, the federal government watches closely, and then breathes a sigh of relief as Bank of… [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
So, when I got to Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent, it initially made some sense to me, and I could envision its appeal to many others. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:19 am by William J. Broderick
”   Like McCullough’s book above, Vogel does an excellent job of telling the story of the characters in this event. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 Hmmm, how does Salmonella Marler sound? [read post]