Search for: "James v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 9,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
In Ohio Appellate Court finds expert testimony on legal malpractice required, legal ethics expert witness James King writes: In a legal malpractice matter, an Ohio state appellate court affirmed a trial court ruling granting summary judgment to defendant attorneys on the basis that plaintiff failed to present expert testimony establishing that defendants failed to exercise “the knowledge, skill, and ability ordinarily possessed and exercised by members of the legal… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
A Port Washington, N.Y., lawyer, James M. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm by INFORRM
” The correction is important since James Robinson is not the only journalist to make this error concerning the important case of McKennitt v Ash. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:58 am by legalinformatics
The authors describe the visualization as follows: With this representation in place, it is possible to measure the size of the Code using it various structural features such as its vertices V and its edges E. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:08 am
.➤➤ Among the volunteer writers, Salman Rushdie has chosen United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm by Anthony McCain
Amgen Richard Lloyd: The Oil States IPR Case Could Be One Of Those Rare Instances Where SCOTUS Sides With The CAFC Scott Graham: Lawmakers Plot Next Steps On Patent Reform Joseph Herndon: Credit Acceptance v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
Just a few weeks after a fantastic piece outlining the struggle for marriage rights – and quoting the ACLU LGBT Project’s very own James Esseks – the New York Times today published an editorial in support of our challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, Windsor v. [read post]