Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
Erie Ins.Anyone desiring a copy of the Kichline v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The court said that it is well established that courts must uphold the disciplinary penalty imposed by an appointing authority unless, as a matter of law, it is an abuse of discretion, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The Appellate Division said that "A police force is a quasi-military organization demanding strict discipline" and "great leeway" must be accorded to "determinations concerning the appropriate punishment, for it is the [Chief of… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:39 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:58 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
” This rule change was prompted by the case of Ginnah Muhammad v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:06 am
Kelly here. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:08 am
Eschenasy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
(The opinions below in both White and Pack were unpublished and both were by the triumvirate of Judges Harty, Thompson and Kelly.) [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:08 am
Kelly, 49 N.J. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm
In People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
Attorney Brian Kelly argued that Bulger might be trying to use the immunity defense despite the judge’s ruling. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 7:05 pm
Ortiz of the motion to dismiss in Kelly Roberts v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Kelly, 23 F.3d 507, 511 (D.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
In addition, a majority of the justices (Cavanagh, Kelly, Hathaway, and Weaver) determined that 11-carboxy-THC is not a schedule 1 controlled substance under MCL § 333.7212 of the Public Health Code and overruled People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:23 pm
Penitentiary v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:18 am
Kelly NEW YORK COUNTYAdministrative LawSchool Psychologist Entitled to Name-Clearing Hearing to Dispute Stigmatizing ChargesKnox v NYC Dept. of Ed.KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, the California Supreme Court adopted the standard set forth in the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in Frye v. [read post]
