Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 29,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Increasing the compensation of the State's judiciaryLarabee v Governor of the State of New York, 2009 NY Slip Op 04296, Decided on June 2, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentTwo Family Court Judges, a Civil Court Judge and a Criminal Court Judge, whose salaries are specified in Judiciary Law § 221-e and § 221-g, initiated litigation naming the Governor, the New York State Senate, the State Assembly, and the… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:25 pm
Gadaleta v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:10 pm
And so there is a realistic chance that the State of Washington’s victory in this case will be short-lived. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
Edens v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 11:02 pm
United States (2010-5012). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
People who live in Michigan will file their product liability lawsuits in federal courts in the drug manufacturers' home states. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 2:24 pm
In Bumpus v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
The Appellant is a Palestinian refugee currently living in Lebanon, having fled the conflict in Syria. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:27 am
It is not clear any of the key events occurred in Texas. 3) Failure to State a Claim: McNamee argues that Clemens' complaint is factually insufficient, by failing to allege with specific detail the defamatory statements--when the statements where made, when, to whom--and cites, of course, Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
At issue was whether the Council’s review officer should take into account “the homeless person’s state of knowledge about the Council’s rejection of the person’s reasons for stating he or she did not wish to live in a particular area”. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
At issue was whether the Council’s review officer should take into account “the homeless person’s state of knowledge about the Council’s rejection of the person’s reasons for stating he or she did not wish to live in a particular area”. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:34 am
The style of the case is, Living Word Teaching Center v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 1:42 pm
Which means ESOPs may live to see another day. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:32 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:18 pm
Holder v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
At that time, Respondent was living in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]