Search for: "London, Appeal of"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 5,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2016, 8:42 am
But the Supreme Court granted review of the court of appeals’ action. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 11:09 am
Mr Y appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), especially how to mesh the Court's deferential standard of review with property owner claims of pretext. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:13 pm
In the wake of this trend, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Brannum v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:15 am
It is a routine effort by one appeals court panel to distinguish what another appeals court panel said. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) McClure & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 12 (19 January 2012) Global 5000 Ltd v Wadhawan [2012] EWCA Civ 13 (19 January 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Glen Dimplex Home Applicances Ltd v Smith & Ors [2011] EWHC 3392 (Comm) (20 December 2011) Starlight Shipping Company v Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 (Comm) (19 December 2011) High Court… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:15 am
This is discussed in a 2019, opinion from the Texas First Court of Appeals. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
" Yesterday's London Telegraph reports on these developments. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:32 am
Commentary on the Assange extradition appeal in the UK Supreme Court after two days of argument before the Justices 5. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
Supreme Court Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & Ors [2010] UKSC 44 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWCA Civ 1208 (27 October 2010) Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 (27 October 2010) Softlanding Systems, Inc v KDP Software Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1172 (27 October 2010) Cartwright v King’s College, London [2010] EWCA Civ 1146 (27 October 2010) Brink’s Global Services Inc &… [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt Des Offentlichen Rechts v JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Supreme Court Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Foundation [2012] UKSC 2 (8 February 2012) Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1 (8 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v LBX & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 79 (08 February 2012) HM Revenue & Customs v Cotter [2012] EWCA Civ 81 (08 February 2012) Carlsberg UK Ltd & Anor v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 82 (08 February 2012) Lloyds Tsb Bank Plc v Markandan & Uddin (a firm)… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:45 am
The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, where its appeal was dismissed. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm
Ms M appealed. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
On Monday 29 and Tuesday 30 June 2020, the UK Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Z & Anor)(AP) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
He is now appealing the decision. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Based in London but presumably not stuck in transit, Alain Pottage is a Reader in Law at the London School of Economics and Political Science, just down the road from this Kat's Holborn office, while Brad Sherman, now Professor of Law at the Griffith University, Brisbane, was formerly attached to the same institution. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Our report on the Court of Appeal decision is here, and there is little to add in this note, because the Supreme Court in Lord Clarke's lead judgment, agree completely with the Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Our report on the Court of Appeal decision is here, and there is little to add in this note, because the Supreme Court in Lord Clarke's lead judgment, agree completely with the Court of Appeal. [read post]
