Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 5:49 am
” Image via Wikipedia.One of thirteen total children to an English lord, Margaret Brent and several of her siblings immigrated to the new world to better their own fortunes. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
It is a Supreme Court case from 1992, Lee v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Bill Baird remembers the events that produced Eisenstadt v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
We mean we cannot have judges legislating lord forbid. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
It is clear that the test which the court must apply to ensure that the proceedings are not prohibitively expensive remains in a state of uncertainty. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:13 am
The decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 may need to be reversed.All these proposals are designed to reduce costs disputes and reduce the cost of costs disputes. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:08 am
Lord
Subscription Required [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
The EHRC, intervening, had argued that Bubb could not longer stand in view of R (CN) v Lewisham LBC (2014) UK SC 62; (2015) AC 1259, and the judgment of Lord Hodge at (71) “71. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm
In Glarum v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
However, in the leading case of Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681l , the House of Lords held that a hospital did have an operational duty to take reasonable steps to protect a mental health patient from suicide where that patient was detained under the MHA. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
There the Court found assistance from Lord Walker in the House of Lords decision in Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
California State Lands Commission (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 549. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
This was essentially an intuitive judgment on principles of fairness which may change with the passage of time, in the context of a statute which creates a discretion (Lord Mustill’s guidance in R v Home Secretary, ex p. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
The constitutional question in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:45 am
Indeed, Lord Hope expressly disavows it being a test at all, stating that it is a question of fact for the tribunal. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
