Search for: "MATTER OF M W" Results 1441 - 1460 of 3,674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
But you don’t really get a choice in the matter as the dividends keep coming and you’re forced to pay taxes on the income. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 Parents’ court fight over taking son, 5, to country suffering terror attacks  reports (though doesn’t link to) W (A Child: Temporary Removal from the Jurisdiction) [2016]. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
Klingel pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.The matter proceeded to a jury trial. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
W-02(IPCV)(A)-511 -03/2016)).BREAKING: US Supreme Court holds cheerleading uniforms eligible for copyright protectionThe US copyright decision everybody was waiting for is finally out – in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands the US Supreme Court has just ruled that cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
“Don’t call me a full partner,” Judge Pohl says, “I’m part of the process, but I’m not your partner on discovery. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In light of its reversal of the Court of Appeal’s judgment upholding the EIR and project approvals on CEQA grounds, the high court stated it did not need to reach plaintiff and appellant’s independent claim that the City also violated a general plan “strategy” requiring it to “[w]ork with appropriate state and federal agencies to identify wetlands and habitats to be preserved and/or restored and those on which development will be permitted. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How would this sensibility, which isn’t concerned w/history, work w/TM law? [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:14 pm
A charge against a landowner who violates the Act, is a provincial offences matter with fines of up to $5,000 (s.61 POA).MacKinnon, J.P. then found that W's road through B's property was a "road" for the purposes of the Road Access Act, meaning that W had a legal authority to use the road at the time for which he was accused of having trespassed. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:34 pm by Rory Little
Ranging from Roberts (“I’m not sure that works”) to Justice Stephen Breyer (“Where does it say that? [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Judge Pohn sums up the government’s position: “[W]e give you what we have and the rest just doesn’t exist. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:49 am by SHG
I’m literally shaking. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  House mark arguments are often made.Fromer: composite mark issues matter—Pretzel Crisps bag has a particular appearance; might come to mind for consumers even if they’re only being asked about the word mark. [read post]