Search for: "MORRISON v. MORRISON" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In our paper, Cross Border Shareholder Class Actions Before and After Morrison, we conduct an empirical inquiry into the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:19 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Even when it is permitted (see this CAB entry discussing the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm by Adrian Lurssen
(Sutherland)- EU Environment Report - December 2011 - January 2012 (White & Case)- FERC Staff Proposes Process on Advising EPA on Extension Requests (Morgan Lewis)- Energy Trends for 2012 (Morrison & Foerster)- One Small Step Forward For Mid-Atlantic Offshore Wind Development (Foley Hoag)- Energy And Environment Update -- January 29, 2012 (Mintz Levin)- Texas Environmental Update - February 1, 2012 (Bracewell & Giuliani)- Regulations Respecting a Cap-And-Trade System for… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Joe Palazzolo
They point to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
” page, Patt Morrison responds to Monday’s decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Research & resources Morrison & Foerster’s Socially Aware Blog has a useful run-down of key moments in the history of social media law, from 1984 to the present day. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the FDIC’s latest lawsuit filed in its role as receiver of a failed bank, the FDIC not only named as defendants nineteen former directors and officers of the failed bank, but also included as defendants seventeen of their spouses and the failed bank’s D&O insurer. [read post]