Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 1441 - 1460 of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2019, 4:22 am by SHG
” After the Sixth Circuit held in Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:58 am
I needed to be revived after reading the TTAB's decision in Tabor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
However, the Principal Assistant Registrar stated that reference to trade mark registrations alone is not conclusive, as it does not reflect the situation in the market.The other registered trade marks could either be dissimilar or do not lead to a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt describing the holding: This appeal marks the latest chapter in a long-running contract dispute between the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (the Tribe) and Lynn Becker, a non-Indian. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am by Cameron Malone-Brown
Little time is wasted in stating that the acquisition of rights with no intention to use, and potentially to prevent third parties from using the mark in relation to these goods or services, will indeed constitute bad faith. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
This marks the first time a state supreme court has ruled on this issue. [read post]