Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1441 - 1460
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 5:55 pm
It's a new month and almost our 6th freaking anniversary in a matter of days, so it's time to take stock but I haven't got the time to do so today, so instead I will simply say thanks to the cadre of wonderful March guest bloggers, and welcome the new voices taking up residence here during the month of April. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:31 am
Posted by Mark T. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:37 pm
This has commonly—and understandably—led to disgruntled contractors who didn’t realize what they were truly giving up when they opted to use their own software in performance of contracts without including regulation-compliant markings and protections. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:02 pm
I would be much grateful if you could advise me on this matter. [read post]
2 May 2014, 10:34 am
And while you're in Hong Kong, don't forget to come and say hello. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:32 am
" Applicant argued that the word "buy" does not identify a genus of services associated with "selling," but the Board didn't buy it. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
* Seeing stars and non-dominant rabbits: a couple of trade mark decisions and a rantJeremy provides a round-up on two recent trade mark decisions coming from the General Court, these being Case T-342/12, Max Fuchs v OHIM, Les Complices and Joined Cases T-122/13, T-123/13 and T-77/13 Laboratoires Polive v OHIM, Arbora & Ausonia SL. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:46 am
It does not matter that he provided such outstanding leadership that he was awarded perfect marks in his 2014, 2015, and 2016 annual reviews. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
” This problem doesn’t require a government solution. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 4:31 am
There is a marked difference between possession and use. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
As you may or may not recall, §32 of the Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of registered marks; courts have read 43(a) to provide a similar cause of action for “unregistered marks”—matter that is not registered with the PTO but serves a trademark function of indicating source. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 11:40 pm
They won't love you back no matter how many ice cream parties you throw for them. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Yes, he could have handled it a little better, but overall, I think he got his point across, but, those who don't want to listen, will not listen, no matter who says what he said. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:48 am
(Emphasis omitted; footnote added; internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 7:49 am
I keep harping on Mark 22:21, but it seems to me that this is where the real failing of the institutional Church is to be found. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 8:14 am
Mark A. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:22 am
The caveat for those who follow this matter? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:47 am
(Emphasis omitted; footnote added; internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:39 am
The letters were in enveloped marked "legal mail" and were signed by an attorney. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
Striking resemblance b/t using a © work as a work (his concept of infringement) and the concept of use of a mark as a mark. [read post]
