Search for: "Matter of Sharp"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am
Arguing for a very sharp distinction between territorial and national power, he insisted that Congress reenacted the Northwest Ordinance to conform with the Appointments Clause because St. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
He describes Reich as "a dear friend and hero to many"--someone renowned for his "brilliant mind" and who was also "a beautiful writer, a wise teacher, a sharp lawyer, a kind soul. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am
Without the issuance of an injunction, reinforced by the contempt powers associated with an injunction, there will be inadequate protection against the recurrence of the defendants’ sharp business practices and the need for renewed litigation. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
The Constitution just is these things no matter what anybody thinks about it. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
It doesn’t really matter who started to conflict – the law is clear: WHEN POLICE SAY STOP –YOU STOP! [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:04 pm
Why progressivity matters - Arguably, this section title should change to better tip off to readers its content and main takeaway. [read post]
31 May 2021, 11:00 pm
At this point, however, we all know that the European Commission would also have preferred for the matter to be resolved by the CJEU. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
Samsung sanctions hearing relating to the "Patentgate" scandal involving improper disclosures of highly confidential terms of Apple's license agreements with Nokia, Ericsson, Sharp, and Philips. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:56 pm
But to do so is a matter for parliamentary and public debate - not a matter for Google or ISPs to fix overnight because David Cameron likes to be seen as a caring family man. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The reason that our courts spend time penning these unimplementable orders is that they know it is not just what they dothat matters, but a [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
And when we talked to them, they often just referred us to what the European Commission was saying--no matter how much of a lie it was.With only one exception, the Brussels-based journalists who covered that legislative process weren't particularly sharp. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
In such cases, a court decided a petitioner’s request (typically ex parte) for a “constitutive” order, which recognized either a legal right or a new legal status in areas such as family law, probate, bankruptcy, naturalization, admiralty, and various equity matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Likewise, there is reason to suspect that American politics has long been especially attuned to matters of process. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
" That statement sounds in welfarism, not rights, because from an animal rights perspective the better thing for Smithfield and other companies to do is to stop exploiting animals altogether.Nonetheless, the distinction between welfare and rights is less sharp than one might think. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
" If you, dear reader, were a prosecutor and could play on that kind of tilted playing field, would you bother to keep your skills sharp? [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 1:49 pm
For that matter, pundits on the right like Hannity and Carlson, and for that matter Musk, exercise more political power than a lot of Republican officeholders.But what about the true pundits? [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 6:27 am
" Given this conclusion, the flaws inherent in the rest of Miller's argument come into sharp relief. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
The Lord President (Lord Carloway), Lord Brodie and Lord Drummond Young unanimously concluded that the Prime Minister’s advice to the Queen was a justiciable matter i.e. a matter which the Court could review, that the advice was motivated by the “improper purpose… of stymying” the UK Parliament and that the advice and, therefore, the prorogation of the UK Parliament with effect from 10 September 2019 were unlawful. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Ivey (or the respondent for that matter) should not cheat. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Their argument being: “I am seeking to enforce the relevant patent and amendment is part of and parcel of enforcement of that patent”.The Court’s reply was sharp:[133] “I do not accept that. [read post]
