Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 118,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm
On July 14, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published Chief Justice Kelly’s majority opinion in Adair v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:16 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
In INS v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:46 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm
See Kocsis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:06 am
Busk v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
As Paul acknowledges "even though comparative constitutionalism may provide greater contrasts and interesting data, surely we get some value from comparative state constitutionalism, especially in these days of same sex marriage litigation. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Last week, on May 24, 2010, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
United States 21-877Issue: Whether a district court may consider the 2018 amendment to the sentences mandated by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
(Sindell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
So what has our State done with the hundreds of persons currently being incarcerated in New York state based on violations of PRS not imposed by judges? [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals fo the 11th Circuit’s rule that reasonable jurists could not debate an issue foreclosed by binding circuit precedent, even when a judge on the panel issued the binding precedent and subsequently stated that the panel’s decision may be erroneous, misapplies the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Polmear and another v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, heard 15th May 2023. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
For judgment, please download: [2019] UKSC 2 For Court’s Press Summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court Website (8 May 2018 morning session) (8 May 2018 afternoon session) (9 May 2018 morning session) (9 May 2018 afternoon session) [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:14 am
Carl v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
