Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
., ;07 CV 8473 (GBD); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which a defendant is asking the court to consider the dual-sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution that allows state and federal governments to prosecute an individual for the same action. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
(Pl.'s SUMF ¶ 58) On April 7, 2015, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Frank Miller dismissed the case against Plaintiff by nolle prosequi. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
” In addition, Russia has accused the United States of violating the INF. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Lisa Monaco presented the dangers of turning inward in response to transregional threats faced by United States faces. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
As attorneys licensed to practice law in Oregon, we took an oath to "support the Constitution and the laws of the United States and of the State of Oregon. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]