Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
The less aggressive redistricting plans adopted this cycle show that even strong partisans have absorbed the lesson that if you create a bunch of 53 percent districts you can lose them when your side’s support goes down by 4 or 5 percent.Justice O'Connor said it best in the original political gerrymandering case, Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
Reuters presents a video interview with Justice Sandra Day O’ Connor. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
United States, 530 U.S. 428, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
” Tony Mauro of the Blog of the Legal Times reports that “[a]ll four women who have served as Supreme Court justices will appear together April 11 for a program celebrating the 30th anniversary of Sandra Day O’Connor’s first term on the Court. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
As Justice O’Connor wrote: ‘‘Whatever rights the Indians may have to the use of the area, those rights do not divest the Government of its right to use what is, after all, its land. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
As Justice O’Connor wrote: ‘‘Whatever rights the Indians may have to the use of the area, those rights do not divest the Government of its right to use what is, after all, its land. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:46 pm
It’s All Subjective: The Legacy of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
This past Friday Iowa became the first state to outlaw using a pretext to gain entry in a J-O-B when what you really want to do is show criminal activity. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Billion Dollar Fix for Free - http://bit.ly/zD4RXW (Craig Ball) A Practical Guide To Responding To Government Investigations - bit.ly/zS0diw (Roderick Thomas, Mark Sweet) A Good eDiscovery Team: eDiscovery Lawyers – Part II - bit.ly/AwOmmY (Dennis Kiker) All’s “Well” for Halliburton: No Sanctions Result from BP’s Spoliation Claims | Cozen… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
The author of that decision was Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who retired a few years later and was replaced by Justice Samuel A. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Writing at Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses the grant in the context of Justice O’Connor’s previous affirmative action opinions. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
As Justice O’Connor put it: “The primary objective of copyright is not to reward the labor of authors, but ‘[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts’…This is neither unfair nor unfortunate. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Chiefly, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who wrote the majority 5-4 decision, has been replaced by Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Chiefly, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who wrote the majority 5-4 decision, has been replaced by Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
bit.ly/xamNyE (Colin O’Keefe, Boris Segalis) “If You’re Gonna Just Read One Blog . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
UPDATE #3: It’s worth emphasizing that Justice Kennedy’s dissent in Grutter explicitly accepted the idea that diversity can be a “compelling state interest” justifying racial classifications, but also castigated Justice O’Connor’s majority opinion for its excessive deference to the judgment of university administrators. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Both sides see the case as a vehicle for narrowing or even overruling O’Connor’s opinion in Grutter, according to Bravin. [read post]
