Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1441 - 1460
of 2,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2013, 9:44 am
MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:49 am
The appellate court concluded by holding that the trial court properly invalidated the agreement. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
City of New York v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
I believe Georgia-Pacific doesn't work well for FRAND royalties because simulating a negotiation between two parties would allow patentees to capture post-standardization hold-up value. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
Wildflower commenced a third-party action for indemnification against City Wide, and City Wide asserted a counterclaim against Wildflower and a cross claim against Classic. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:52 am
Rolling in the Dough, Inc. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
Wildflower commenced a third-party action for indemnification against City Wide, and City Wide asserted a counterclaim against Wildflower and a cross claim against Classic. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
City of Santa Monica is pending in the State Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal declined to rule on this issue. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Prior to plaintiff's accident, Levitz had sold large furniture shelving rack unit, as well as other similar units, to defendant and third-party plaintiff International Storage Systems, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Prior to plaintiff's accident, Levitz had sold large furniture shelving rack unit, as well as other similar units, to defendant and third-party plaintiff International Storage Systems, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:14 am
In re Stript Wax Bar, LLC November 16, 2012) [not precedential].In comparing the marks the Board noted that, under the CAFC's ruling in Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:15 am
Take, for example, the recent case of Matter of D’Angelo (D’Angelo Funeral Home, Inc.), Mem. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
There’s also mention of a holding rejecting hospital strict liability in Kirkendall v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:30 am
Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s direction in Housing Authority Of City Of New Brunswick v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Palo Alto (6th Dist. 2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 286-302 (same; when private party can compel approval without design changes that might alleviate adverse environmental consequences, project is ministerial under “functional” test). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Palo Alto (6th Dist. 2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 286-302 (same; when private party can compel approval without design changes that might alleviate adverse environmental consequences, project is ministerial under “functional” test). [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
Riverside Hospital, Inc., et al., No. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
