Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The trial in the case of Feyziyev v Radu was listed before Whipple J on the same day but the matter has settled. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
Some argue that it might deter people from using the Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
The order's heyday is long gone and you would be foolish to advise a client that they could walk down to their local court and obtain one unless they have an extremely strong case against the respondent, that the damage was/could be very serious and that they had clear evidence that the respondents were in possession of the relevant information and there was a strong possibility they would destroy the material should they be put on notice of the application (see Lord Justice… [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
ECtHR 8 November 2005, Bader and others v Sweden, par. 47; ECtHR 22 June 2006, D. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
People v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
For example, the House of Lords may follow a Court of Appeal decision, and the Court of appeal may follow a High Court decision, although not strictly bound to do so. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
"Games might be and [are] the serious business of life to many people. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:10 am
People do price shop (esp. in real estate closings- these people often use a lawyer referred by the realtor who wants someone cheap so that the deal goes thru). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
For example, the House of Lords has previously said: ‘The media have greater powers of disseminating information widely than other people have, but it has not been suggested by any party to this appeal that the media have any special privileges in law in the matter of freedom of speech. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:02 pm
She considers such cases as Hatton v United Kingdom, Lopez Ostra v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/uh4sqGyvPW -> ALJ Lord Grants Motion For Summary Determination Of No Copyright Infringement In Certain TV Programs http://t.co/rfG4i1r2iS -> ECommerce vendor not entitled to DMCA hosting safe harbor Gardner v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
My hypothesis for now is that in the early years of CanLII, the coverage was just too thin to generate more than small-but-steady growth in impact, but that by 2011, the collection covered a big enough range of years to be relied upon by more people, and in turn to have more impact on the form of legal decisions. [read post]
