Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
The main item on the menu, entitled "A Gallic infringement", is an attempt by Lord Hoffmann and Sir Robin Jacob to roast French IP practitioner Maître Pierre Véron. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:56 pm
" Legg v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Lord Justice Carnworth said: 36. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
As Lord Justice Sedley rightly said “legislation like this is or ought to be written for lay people“. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The older scheme placed people on the list if they were merely suspected of an offence, which the House of Lords rightly considered to be too harsh, despite the importance of protecting children. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Lord v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
And allow me to venture a guess or two… you guys at Chase are “overwhelmed” with requests for loan modifications… you’re busy… friends came in unexpectedly from out of town… you just can’t hire people to meet the demand… or wait… I know… Mr. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:50 am
The Strasbourg court has notified Austria that its request for referral of the case of Frodl v Austria to the Grand Chamber has been rejected. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
We all know that there are plenty of people occupying accommodation in those two categories. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
Broom v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2695 (Admin) – Read Judgment When he was transferred from Whitemoor prison to Wakefield Prison in May 2008, Mr. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm
Update, 2 Nov 2010 – Listen to John Hirst (of the Hirst case and the Jailhouse Lawyer blog) and Lord Falconer debating the issue on Radio 4? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The leading authority for many years has been Hunt v- Severs (1994). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
