Search for: "People v Peters" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The jiplp weblog carries a crisp, clear account by Peter Jabaly of the US decision in Air-Freshner v Paul Getty and the limited utility of fair use defences in trade mark infringement proceedings. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
As the case against May & Tucker buckled, the advocate depute contacted the then Lord Advocate, Lord Peter Fraser, now Ministerial Complaints adviser to Alex Salmond, who concurred the case should be dropped, even though it was by then clear to many onlookers, there was a gay Scottish judges connection with Thailand’s gay boy industry. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
v=wA3Tbs_FvAA http://www.youtube.com/user/NYCCouncil   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-c-quinn/lets-protect-our-children_b_1285346.html? [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm by LindaMBeale
  For further discussion of the implications of the case, see Peter Weiss, Should corporations have more leeway to kill than people do? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am by Legal Beagle
Her pioneering achievements will be an inspiration to people both within and outside the College, and I very much look forward to welcoming her to Oxford. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 am by Stanford Law Review
Online 75); Famous for Fifteen People: Celebrity, Newsworthiness, and Fraley v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" wonders @ExtremeTech pjblack.me/x6czuC this is interesting: "Is Marriage Only For Rich People? [read post]