Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 1:31 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
People seem to disagree about what this scholarly oeuvre adds up to: close to nothing (e.g., Paul Campos), something quite substantial (e.g., Eugene Volokh), or not particularly remarkable in either direction (e.g., Erin Miller). [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm by Chris Martin
One example emerged in the hearings during Kitzmiller v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Massachusetts got it exactly right; Davis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts got it exactly right; Davis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 29 November 2019 Davis LJ and Warby J handed down the reserved judgment in the case of R (Liberal Democrats) v ITV Broadcasting Ltd [2019] EWHC 3282 (Admin), giving the full reasons for the dismissal of the application for judicial review. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. [read post]